free ebooks

A Handbook of the English Language by Latham

There feminine dative and singular


2.

The idea expressed by _he_, _it_, and _she_ is naturally that of demonstrativeness. In the Latin language _is, ea, id_; _ille, illa, illud_; _hic, haec, hoc_, are demonstrative pronouns in sense, as well as in declension.

3. The plural forms _they, them_, in the present English, are the plural forms of the root of _that_, a true demonstrative pronoun; so that even if _he_, _she_, and _it_ could be treated as personal pronouns, _they_ could not.

4. The word _she_ has grown out of the Anglo-Saxon _se['o]_. Now _se['o]_ was in Anglo-Saxon the feminine form of the definite article; the definite article itself being originally a demonstrative pronoun.

s. 228. Compared with the Anglo-Saxon the present English stands as follows:--

_She_.--The Anglo-Saxon form _he['o]_, being lost to the language, is replaced by the feminine article _se['o]_.

s. 229. _Her_.--This is a case, not of the present _she_, but of the Anglo-Saxon _he['o]_: so that _she_ may be said to be defective in the oblique cases, and _her_ to be defective in the nominative.

_Him_.--A dative form, which has replaced the Anglo-Saxon _hine_. When used as a dative, it was neuter as well as masculine.

_His_.--Originally neuter as well as masculine. Now as a neuter, replaced by _its_--"et

quidem ipsa vox _his_, ut et interrogativum _whose_, nihil aliud sunt quam _hee's_, _who's_, ubi s omnino idem praestat quod in aliis possessivis. Similiter autem _his_ pro _hee's_ eodem errore quo nonnunquam _bin_ pro _been_; item _whose_ pro _who's_ eodem errore quo _done_, _gone_, _knowne_, _growne_, &c., pro _doen_, _goen_, _knowen,_ vel _do'n_, _go'n_, _know'n_, _grow'n_; utrobique contra analogiam linguae; sed usu defenditur."--Wallis, c.v.

_It_.--Changed from the Anglo-Saxon _hit_, by the ejection of h. The t is no part of the original word, but a sign of the neuter gender, forming it regularly from _he_. The same neuter sign is preserved in the Latin _id_ and _illud_.

_Its_.--In the course of time the nature of the neuter sign t, in _it_, the form being found in but a few words, became misunderstood. Instead of being looked on as an affix, it passed for part of the original word. Hence was formed from _it_ the anomalous genitive _its_ superseding the Saxon _his_. The same was the case with--

_Hers_.--The r is no part of the original word, but the sign of the dative case. These formations are of value in the history of cases.

s. 230. _Theirs_.--In the same predicament with _hers_ and _its_; either the case of an adjective, or a case formed from a case.

_Than_ or _then_, and _there_.--Although now adverbs, they were once demonstrative pronouns, in a certain case and in a certain gender, viz., _than_ and _then_ masculine accusative and singular, _there_ feminine dative and singular.

s. 231. An exhibition of the Anglo-Saxon declension is the best explanation of the English. Be it observed, that the cases marked in italics are found in the present language.

I.

_Se, se['o]_ ( = _she_).

Of this word we meet two forms only, both of the singular number, and both in the nominative case; viz., masc., _se_; fem. _se['o]_ ( = the). The neuter gender and the other cases of the article were taken from the pronoun _thaet_ ( = that).


eBook Search
Social Sharing
Share Button
About us

freefictionbooks.org is a collection of free ebooks that can be read online. Ebooks are split into pages for easier reading and better bookmarking.

We have more than 35,000 free books in our collection and are adding new books daily.

We invite you to link to us, so as many people as possible can enjoy this wonderful free website.

© 2010-2013 freefictionbooks.org - All Rights Reserved.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us