Produced by Clare Boothby, Ben Beasley and PG Distributed Proofreaders
[Illustration: KEPLER]
Pioneers of Progress
Men of Science Edited by S. Chapman, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S.
KEPLER
by WALTER W. BRYANT of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich
1920
CONTENTS.
I. Astronomy Before Kepler
II. Early Life of Kepler
III. Tycho Brahe
IV. Kepler Joins Tycho
V. Kepler's Laws
VI. Closing Years
Appendix I.--List of Dates
Appendix II.--Bibliography
Glossary
CHAPTER I.
ASTRONOMY BEFORE KEPLER.
In order to emphasise the importance of the reforms introduced into astronomy by Kepler, it will be well to sketch briefly the history of the theories which he had to overthrow. In very early times it must have been realised that the sun and moon were continually changing their places among the stars. The day, the month, and the year were obvious divisions of time, and longer periods were suggested by the tabulation of eclipses. We can imagine the respect accorded to the Chaldaean sages who first discovered that eclipses could be predicted, and how the philosophers of Mesopotamia must have sought eagerly for evidence of fresh periodic laws. Certain of the stars, which appeared to wander, and were hence called planets, provided an extended field for these speculations. Among the Chaldaeans and Babylonians the knowledge gradually acquired was probably confined to the priests and utilised mainly for astrological prediction or the fixing of religious observances. Such speculations as were current among them, and also among the Egyptians and others who came to share their knowledge, were almost entirely devoted to mythology, assigning fanciful terrestrial origins to constellations, with occasional controversies as to how the earth is supported in space. The Greeks, too, had an elaborate mythology largely adapted from their neighbours, but they were not satisfied with this, and made persistent attempts to reduce the apparent motions of celestial objects to geometrical laws. Some of the Pythagoreans, if not Pythagoras himself, held that the earth is a sphere, and that the apparent daily revolution of the sun and stars is really due to a motion of the earth, though at first this motion of the earth was not supposed to be one of rotation about an axis. These notions, and also that the planets on the whole move round from west to east with reference to the stars, were made known to a larger circle through the writings of Plato. To Plato moreover is attributed the challenge to astronomers to represent all the motions of the heavenly bodies by uniformly described circles, a challenge generally held responsible for a vast amount of wasted effort, and the postponement, for many centuries, of real progress. Eudoxus of Cnidus, endeavouring to account for the fact that the planets, during every apparent revolution round the earth, come to rest twice, and in the shorter interval between these "stationary points," move in the opposite direction, found that he could represent the phenomena fairly well by a system of concentric spheres, each rotating with its own velocity, and carrying its own particular planet round its own equator, the outermost sphere carrying the fixed stars. It was necessary to assume that the axes about which the various spheres revolved should have circular motions also, and gradually an increased number of spheres was evolved, the total number required by Aristotle reaching fifty-five. It may be regarded as counting in Aristotle's favour that he did consider the earth to be a sphere and not a flat disc, but he seems to have thought that the mathematical spheres of Eudoxus had a real solid existence, and that not only meteors, shooting stars and aurora, but also comets and the milky way belong to the atmosphere. His really great service to science in collating and criticising all that was known of natural science would have been greater if so much of the discussion had not been on the exact meaning of words used to describe phenomena, instead of on the facts and causes of the phenomena themselves.
Table of contents (by pages)
- 1: Kepler by Walter W. Bryant
- 2: Thus bisecting the excentricity
- 3: Half a century after the death of Copernicus
- 4: And to keep a tavern at Elmendingen
- 5: This happened to be the lectureship in astronomy at Gratz
- 6: Being the point at the other end of the quadrant
- 7: Who asserted that Reymers had simply plagiarised his work
- 8: He obtained the Alphonsine and the new Prutenic Tables
- 9: Tycho observed with him for some time
- 10: Dealing with the comet of 1577
- 11: And removed from Benatek to Prague
- 12: Kepler threw up his professorship
- 13: What it may portend is hard to determine
- 14: He went carefully into the question of refraction
- 15: Kepler very strongly combated these notions
- 16: But as to the centre of a cognate round body
- 17: Kepler had preferred not to make it
- 18: Should have an equant as well as the planets
- 19: Kepler concluded that Mars moved round PNQ
- 20: And suffered to depart to Linz
- 21: Who again retained Kepler in his post
- 22: On the mental essence of Harmonics
- 23: The sextile of Mars and Jupiter
- 24: In his Epitome of the Copernican Astronomy
- 25: We may infer that Kepler was one of the first
- 26: His body was buried at Ratisbon
- 27: He refers to Kepler as the man whose place
- 28: Equant In Ptolemy's excentric theory
