A LETTER
TO
GROVER CLEVELAND,
ON
HIS FALSE INAUGURAL ADDRESS, THE USURPATIONS AND CRIMES OF LAWMAKERS AND JUDGES, AND THE CONSEQUENT POVERTY, IGNORANCE, AND SERVITUDE OF THE PEOPLE.
BY LYSANDER SPOONER.
BOSTON: BENJ. R. TUCKER, PUBLISHER. 1886.
The author reserves his copyright in this letter. First pamphlet edition published in July, 1886.[1]
[1] Under a somewhat different title, to wit, "_A Letter to Grover Cleveland, on his False, Absurd, If-contradictory, and Ridiculous Inaugural Address_," this letter was first published, in instalments, "LIBERTY" (a paper published in Boston); the instalments commencing June 20, 1885, and continuing to May 22, 1886: notice being given, in each paper, of the reservation of copyright.
A LETTER TO GROVER CLEVELAND.
SECTION I.
_To Grover Cleveland_:
SIR,--Your inaugural address is probably as honest, sensible, and consistent a one as that of any president within the last fifty years, or, perhaps, as any since the foundation of the government. If, therefore, it is false, absurd, self-contradictory, and ridiculous, it is not (as I think) because you are personally less honest, sensible, or consistent than your predecessors, but because the government itself--according to your own description of it, and according to the practical administration of it for nearly a hundred years--is an utterly and palpably false, absurd, and criminal one. Such praises as you bestow upon it are, therefore, necessarily false, absurd, and ridiculous.
Thus you describe it as "a government pledged to do equal and exact justice to all men."
Did you stop to think what that means? Evidently you did not; for nearly, or quite, all the rest of your address is in direct contradiction to it.
Let me then remind you that justice is an immutable, natural principle; and not anything that can be made, unmade, or altered by any human power.
It is also a subject of science, and is to be learned, like mathematics, or any other science. It does not derive its authority from the commands, will, pleasure, or discretion of any possible combination of men, whether calling themselves a government, or by any other name.
It is also, at all times, and in all places, the supreme law. And being everywhere and always the supreme law, it is necessarily everywhere and always the only law.
Table of contents (by pages)
- 1: A Letter to Grover Cleveland by Lysander Spooner
- 2: And ridiculous to say that lawmakers
- 3: Or forbid anything but injustice
- 4: May rightfully be used against him
- 5: Therefore all the pretences of so called lawmakers
- 6: Who would scorn to usurp any arbitrary dominion over him
- 7: If taxation without consent is robbery
- 8: Given for you and your lawmakers
- 9: To the satisfaction of the lawmakers
- 10: In consideration of such protection
- 11: Nor protect any one from competition
- 12: Given by the privileged to the unprivileged
- 13: According to their own irresponsible will
- 14: As he may be able to make with his fellow lawmakers
- 15: If you were now required to name such a lawmaker
- 16: For mutual support of their respective robberies
- 17: The bitterness of partisan defeat
- 18: The promotion of their welfare
- 19: And anxiously studying their welfare
- 20: Evidently they are the lawmakers
- 21: And why are the lawmakers dangerous to our liberty
- 22: We can now see why lawmakers are the only enemies
- 23: Irresponsible dominion of the lawmakers
- 24: Under your system of lawmaking
- 25: As it is of all other lawmaking governments
- 26: That no man can rightfully be compelled to fulfil
- 27: It asserts that government owns the planet
- 28: The laws arbitrarily prohibiting
- 29: The most prominent advocate of the monopoly
- 30: And inasmuch as this monopoly of money is
- 31: Will you dispute the truth of that proposition
- 32: Is prohibited by the lawmakers
- 33: In payment of the notes discounted
- 34: Except the few holders of the monopoly of money
- 35: It is nothing but downright robbery
- 36: They are levied upon the imported commodity
- 37: Of the employers of home labor
- 38: These are the only pauper laborers
- 39: Or on the verge of pauperism who are destitute
- 40: Who are also the monopolists of money
- 41: These monopolists of money assume that pauper labor
- 42: The competition of pauper labor with pauper labor
- 43: And these promissory notes were permitted to be lent
- 44: Although the State lawmakers have
- 45: This one principle of validity
- 46: The question is as unsettled now
- 47: Whenever they are commanded to do so by the lawmakers
- 48: Saunders 12 Wheaton 213 the question was
- 49: Which lawmakers may assume to create
- 50: Giving and receiving property are naturally obligatory
- 51: For this is what no lawmakers have ever attempted to do
- 52: We should have no need of insolvent or bankrupt laws
- 53: That are arbitrarily forbidden
- 54: And therefore cannot impair its obligation
- 55: If the lawmakers can make any part of men's contracts
- 56: From liability for partnership debts
- 57: Just as much right to cheat debtors
- 58: Every contract for the payment of money
- 59: That is conveyed by a warranty deed
- 60: To legalize either their robberies
- 61: When the public exigency requires it
- 62: And devoted to robbery and oppression
- 63: Representing the victorious faction
- 64: Except the few holders of the monopoly
- 65: So these knavish lawmakers called this penalty a tax
- 66: And protect these monopolies against infringement
- 67: This is simply a power to weigh and assay metals
- 68: But to give them any monopoly as money
- 69: And its power to establish a monopoly of money
- 70: To reestablish that principle in France
- 71: And the incidents of sovereignty
- 72: And creating a national sovereignty
- 73: As judges of our Supreme Court
- 74: Those famous champions of sovereignty
- 75: He never declared a single State law unconstitutional
- 76: Its right to prohibit them is unquestionable
- 77: Like all others vested in congress
- 78: And irresponsible cabal of lawmakers
- 79: By knavish lawmakers and their courts
- 80: That their contracts have an intrinsic obligation
- 81: Though intrinsically obligatory
- 82: Which he was so famous for expounding
- 83: The constitution authorized no lawmaking at all
- 84: Recommended that very stringent amendments
- 85: That ratified the constitution
- 86: Numerous amendments were proposed
- 87: Elliot gives no accounts at all
- 88: Owing to the usurpations of lawmakers and courts
- 89: Are necessarily absurd and void contracts
- 90: But inasmuch as he cannot delegate
- 91: For judicial and executive duties
- 92: Under such systems of lawmaking
- 93: You need have no hope of an acquittal
- 94: The secret instructions of lawmakers
- 95: And the lawmakers by whom these courts are established
