A Morning's Walk from London to Kew by Phillips

Page 1 of 110

A MORNING'S WALK FROM

LONDON TO KEW.

By SIR RICHARD PHILLIPS.

_LONDON:_

PRINTED BY J. ADLARD, 23, BARTHOLOMEW-CLOSE; SOLD BY JOHN SOUTER, 1, PATERNOSTER-ROW; AND BY ALL BOOKSELLERS.

1817.

PREFACE.

The Author of the following Observations, made during #A MORNING'S WALK#, will doubtless be allowed to possess but a moderate degree of literary ambition. He has not qualified himself, by foreign travels, to transport his readers above the clouds, on the Andes, the Alps, or the Apennines; to alarm them by descriptions of Earthquakes, or Eruptions; or to astonish them by accounts of tremendous Chasms, Caverns, and Cataracts: but he has restricted his researches to subjects of home scenery, which thousands can daily examine after him; and consequently has not enjoyed that _latitude_ of fancy, or been able to exercise any of those rare powers of _hearing_ and _seeing_, by means of which travellers into distant regions are enabled to stimulate curiosity and monopolize fame.

The class of readers who seek for sources of pleasure beyond the ordinary course of nature, will therefore feel disappointment in attempting to follow a pedestrian tourist through a route so destitute of wonders. Nor will this feeling, it is to be feared, be confined to searchers after supernatural phenomena in regard to the facts which appertain to such a work. In the sentiments which accompany his narrations, it will be found that the Author, accustomed to think for himself, admits no standards of truth superior to the evidence of the senses and the deductions of reason; consequently, that his conclusions on many important topics are at variance with existing practices, whenever it appears they have no better foundation than the continuity of prejudices and the arbitrary laws of custom. He therefore entertains very serious doubts whether his work will be acceptable to those #learned Professors# in Universities, who teach no doctrines or opinions but those of their predecessors; or whether it will suit #Students#, whose advancement depends on their submission to the dogmata of such superiors. He questions whether it will ever be quoted as an authority by #Statesmen# who consider the will of princes as standards of wisdom;--by #Legislators# who barter away their votes, and decide on the presumed integrity of ministers and leaders;--by #Politicians# who banish the moral feelings from their practices;--or by #Economists# who do not consider individual happiness as the primary object of their calculations. Nor is he more sanguine that his work will prove agreeable to those #Natural Philosophers# who account for phenomena by the operation of virtues or influences which have no mechanical contact;--or to those #Metaphysicians# who conceive that truth can be exhibited only in the sophistical subtleties of the schools displayed in the mazy labyrinths of folios and quartos;--or to those #Theologians# who maintain that the obligations of reason and morality are superseded by those of Faith. While, in regard to those #Topographers# and #Antiquaries# whose studies are bounded by dates of erection, catalogues of occupants, and copies of tomb-stones;--to those #Naturalists# who receive delight from enumerations of Linnaean names of herbs, shrubs, and trees, and from Wernerian descriptions of rocks;--to those #Bibliomaniacs# who value a book in the inverse ratio of the information it contains;--and to those #learned Philologists# who see no beauties in modern tongues, and affect to find (_but without anticipating any of them_,) all modern discoveries of Natural Philosophy in Homer, and all improvements of mental Philosophy in the mysteries of Plato--the author deeply laments his utter inability to accommodate either his taste, his feelings, or his conclusions.

Prev - Next >>

Share this book

Table of contents (by pages)