Produced by Bryan Ness and PG Distributed Proofreaders
Q.E.D.
Or New Light on the Doctrine of Creation
By
GEORGE McCREADY PRICE
_Professor of Chemistry and Physics, Lodi Academy, California
Author of "Outlines of Modern Science and Modern Christianity," "The Fundamentals of Geology," "God's Two Books," "Back to the Bible," "A Text-Book of General Science," etc._
"... and set you square with Genesis again." --_Robert Browning_.
1917
_To
WILLIAM CLEAVER WILKINSON Scholar, Critic, Poet and Christian Gentleman
This book is dedicated by one who owes to his advice and kindly sympathy more than can be expressed_
Preface
The great world disaster, ushered in with the dawn of that August morning in 1914, has already brought revolutionary changes in many departments of our thinking. But not the least of the surprises awaiting an amazed world, whenever attention can again be directed to such subjects, will be the realization that we have now definitely outgrown many notions in science and philosophy which in the old order of things were supposed to have been eternally settled.
There are but two theories regarding the origin of our world and of the various forms of plants and animals upon it, Creation and Evolution,--the latter assuming many modifications.
The essential idea of the Evolution theory is _uniformity_; that is, it seeks to show that life in all its various forms and manifestations probably originated by causes similar to or identical with forces and processes now prevailing. It teaches the absolute supremacy and the past continuity of natural law as now observed. It says that the changes now going on in our modern world have always been in action and that these present-day natural changes and processes are as much a part of the origin of things as anything that ever took place in the past. In short, Evolution as a philosophy of nature is an effort to smooth out all distinction between Creation and the ordinary processes of nature that are now under the regime of "natural law."
On the other hand, the essential idea of the doctrine of Creation is that, back at a period called the "beginning," forces and powers were brought into exercise and results were accomplished that have not since been exercised or accomplished. That is, the origin of the first organic forms, indeed of the whole world as we know it, was essentially and radically _different_ from the ways in which these forms are perpetuated and the world sustained to-day. _Time_ is in no way the essential idea in the problem. The question of _how much time_ was occupied in the work of Creation is of no importance, neither is the question of _how long ago_ it took place. The one essential idea is that in its nature Creation is essentially inscrutable; we can never hope to know just how it was accomplished; we cannot expect to know the process or the details, for we have nothing with which to measure it. The one essential thing in the doctrine of Creation is that the origin of our world and of the things upon it came about at some period of time in the past by a direct and unusual manifestation of Divine power; and that since this original Creation other and different forces and powers have prevailed to sustain and perpetuate the forms of life and indeed the entire world as then called into existence.
Table of contents (by pages)
- 1: Q. E. D., or New Light on the Doctrine of Creation
- 2: All by natural law as now prevailing
- 3: But these dilatory methods of professional pedantry
- 4: To the rays emitted by radioactive substances
- 5: Discovered the new element radium
- 6: Helium atoms positively electrified
- 7: The calculated period of radium is 2
- 8: Composed of identical protoplasm and structurally alike
- 9: If these are mere duplicates of each other
- 10: The amount of energy in our world
- 11: Is that it must be perfectly frictionless
- 12: And the rigid substances are not elastic
- 13: Which always results in degeneration
- 14: All separate masses of protoplasm
- 15: While inorganic liquids grow by intussusception
- 16: As a recipe for producing a pot of mice offhand
- 17: The disappointment of those opposing biogenesis was severe
- 18: And the botanist is called upon to define the difference
- 19: Among the unicellular plants are the bacteria
- 20: Or the tubercle bacillus produce the symptoms of leprosy
- 21: Certain cells in the developing embryo
- 22: These do not again merge through metaplasia
- 23: This definition assumed the fixity of species
- 24: 15 This author adds that this physiological test
- 25: If subjected to breeding tests
- 26: In the sense assigned by Linnaeus
- 27: To use the phrase of Herbert Spencer
- 28: Biologists have grown very cautious
- 29: Mendel worked chiefly with peas
- 30: But at any rate wingless insects may also arise
- 31: The kinds so produced are termed mutants
- 32: Separately transmitted in heredity
- 33: So far as the so called mutation hypothesis
- 34: The laws governing cell multiplication
- 35: Though possessing little general education
- 36: Geology has never yet been regenerated
- 37: Or next to the Primitive or Archaean
- 38: Very many others have skipped from the Mesozoic down
- 39: Of which those at Glarus were the first to be discovered
- 40: The fossils are here in the wrong order
- 41: Resting on soft Cretaceous shales
- 42: Geology always follows facts and common sense
- 43: The so called geological succession
- 44: Of the changes recorded in the fossiliferous rocks
- 45: So far as creation is concerned
- 46: Its transcendent importance for our generation
- 47: And which cannot well be distinguished from pantheism
- 48: Footnote 54 The Unseen Universe
- 49: Omnipresent throughout the universe
- 50: The baby sucks with pleasure and profit
- 51: Not to the close of Creation
- 52: WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR The Fundamentals of Geology Cloth
