A SIXTH-CENTURY FRAGMENT
of the
LETTERS OF PLINY THE YOUNGER
A Study of Six Leaves of an Uncial Manuscript Preserved in the Pierpont Morgan Library New York
by
E. A. LOWE
Associate of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Sandars Reader at Cambridge University (1914) Lecturer in Palaeography at Oxford University
and
E. K. RAND
Professor of Latin in Harvard University
[Illustration: CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON 1902]
Published by the CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON Washington, 1922
CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON
Publication No. 304
The University Press CAMBRIDGE, MASS. U. S. A.
PREFATORY NOTE.
The Pierpont Morgan Library, itself a work of art, contains masterpieces of painting and sculpture, rare books, and illuminated manuscripts. Scholars generally are perhaps not aware that it also possesses the oldest Latin manuscripts in America, including several that even the greatest European libraries would be proud to own. The collection is also admirably representative of the development of script throughout the Middle Ages. It comprises specimens of the uncial hand, the half-uncial, the Merovingian minuscule of the Luxeuil type, the script of the famous school of Tours, the St. Gall type, the Irish and Visigothic hands, and the Beneventan and Anglo-Saxon scripts.
Among the oldest manuscripts of the library, in fact the oldest, is a hitherto unnoticed fragment of great significance not only to palaeographers, but to all students of the classics. It consists of six leaves of an early sixth-century manuscript of the _Letters_ of the younger Pliny. This new witness to the text, older by three centuries than the oldest codex heretofore used by any modern editor, has reappeared in this unexpected quarter, after centuries of wandering and hiding. The fragment was bought by the late J. Pierpont Morgan in Rome, in December 1910, from the art dealer Imbert; he had obtained it from De Marinis, of Florence, who had it from the heirs of the Marquis Taccone, of Naples. Nothing is known of the rest of the manuscript.
The present writers had the good fortune to visit the Pierpont Morgan Library in 1915. One of the first manuscripts put into their hands was this early sixth-century fragment of Pliny's _Letters_, which forms the subject of the following pages. Having received permission to study the manuscript and publish results, they lost no time in acquainting classical scholars with this important find. In December of the same year, at the joint meeting of the American Archaeological and Philological Associations, held at Princeton University, two papers were read, one concerning the palaeographical, the other the textual, importance of the fragment. The two studies which follow, Part I by Doctor Lowe, Part II by Professor Rand, are an elaboration of the views presented at the meeting. Some months after the present volume was in the form of page-proof, Professor E.T. Merrill's long-expected edition of Pliny's _Letters_ appeared (Teubner, Leipsic, 1922). We regret that we could not avail ourselves of it in time to introduce certain changes. The reader will still find Pliny cited by the pages of Keil, and in general he should regard the date of our production as 1921 rather than 1922.
Table of contents (by pages)
- 1: A Sixth-Century Fragment of the Letters of Pliny t
- 2: Description of the Fragment Contents
- 3: While the rest are all quires of eight
- 4: But formed part of a quaternion
- 5: And adding thereto pages for colophons and indices
- 6: Paul in Carinthia agrees with our fragment
- 7: 53v the monogram QR 11 and the roman numerals i
- 8: Syllabification in Latin Inscriptions
- 9: Exsecutos 23
- 10: Which was wrongly expanded to TRANQUE
- 11: To judge by the retouched characters on fol
- 12: 24 The scribe first wrote EXCUCURIS SEM COMMEATU
- 13: The Codex Fuldensis of the Gospels
- 14: Exempla codicum latinorum litteris maiusculis scriptorum
- 15: Liber Paschalis Codicis Cicensis A
- 16: Vorkarolingische Miniaturen Berlin 1916
- 17: Specimina codicum latinorum Vaticanorum
- 18: Specimina codicum latinorum Vaticanorum
- 19: Monumenta palaeographica sacra
- 20: Usually in large sized uncials
- 21: All efforts to identify Jehan de Sannemeres
- 22: Lyons preserved the Codex Theodosianus
- 23: Footnote 4 4 Over an erasure apparently
- 24: Footnote 1 The scribe first wrote hilaritatis
- 25: Footnote 6 A somewhat later corrector
- 26: Omitting accepto ut praefectus aerari
- 27: 1 Sidenote The Codex Parisinus Aldus Manutius
- 28: Ut putem scriptum Plinii temporibus
- 29: The portions of Book X published by Avantius in 1502
- 30: It is Budaeus's own collation from the Parisinus
- 31: Comport with what we know of Aldus's Parisinus
- 32: 18 Footnote 18 The spellings Karet and Karitas
- 33: 29 questuri Pi quaesturi MVa Aldus's reading
- 34: But Chatelain labels his facsimile page Saec
- 35: And Leidensis Vossianus 98 saec
- 36: In Sitzungsberichte der Bayer
- 37: V accusationibus uoluntariis Pi BFGa
- 38: 9 praestat amat me praestatam ad me B
- 39: For PRAECEPTORIA ends the line in Pi
- 40: 6 tum optime libertati venia obsequio praeparatur
- 41: As AD SUETON TRANQUE tranqui B
- 42: By the comparatively small amount of matter in Pi
- 43: Must have been a manuscript in majuscules
- 44: Aegrotabat Caecina aegrotabat om
- 45: Opisthographos torumque opisthographos om
- 46: P had the spelling Karitas consistently
- 47: The pointed obelus great interest
- 48: 9 ardentibus dicere Pi BFDG r
- 49: 12 excolendusque Pi BFD p
- 50: The reading of Beroaldus on 63
- 51: Three are accepted by Kukula and five by Merrill
- 52: And Catanaeus exhibentur ita comparata sunt omnia
- 53: In one case he misquotes Aldus
- 54: Written in Caroline minuscule of the ninth century
